Certification



Certification

TR CU confirmation schemes


Procedure for use of typical schemes of evaluation (confirmation) of conformity of Technical Regulations of Customs Union (TR CU) is performed in accordance with the Instruction approved by the Decision of the Customs Union Commission dated April 7, 2011 No. 621.

General provisions

Confirmation of conformity (CoC) is performed in the form of certification or declaration of conformity, based on the typical schemes.

A typical scheme for confirmation of conformity is a set of activities (elements), the results of which are used to make decisions on the conformity (non-conformity) of products with the requirements of the technical regulation.

In general, such activities (elements) are:

  • Analysis of technical documentation;
  • Identification, product testing, product type assessment;
  • Production evaluation, manufacturing supervision;
  • Issuance of certificate of conformity, adoption of a declaration of conformity with technical regulations in a single form, approved by the Customs Union Commission;
  • Registration of declarations of conformity;
  • Application of a single product commercialization mark on the market of the member states of the Customs Union;
  • Inspection check-up.

Depending on the typical certification scheme, confirmation of conformity is carried out by an accredited certification body for products, an accredited body for certification of management systems included in the Unified Register of certification bodies and testing laboratories (centres) of the Customs Union.

Depending on the typical declaration scheme,confirmation of conformity is carried out based on the own evidence (s), obtained with the participation of an accredited certification body for products, an accredited body for certification of management systems included in the Unified Register of certification bodies and testing laboratories (centres) of the Customs Union.

Typical certification schemes

Scheme No. Scheme element Note Document of Conformity
Product testing Production evaluation Inspection check-up
Product sample testing аProduction state analysis Product sample testing and (or) production state analysis For mass-produced products.
An applicant-manufacturer, including the foreign one, in the presence of a person authorized by the manufacturer in the Customs Union’s territory.
Certificate of Conformity for mass-produced products
Product sample testing Management system certification Product sample testing and management system control
Product sample testing - - For batch of products (one-off item).
An applicant-manufacturer (supplier), including the foreign one.
Certificate of conformity for a batch of products
One-off item testing - - Certificate of conformity for the one-off item
Product design research Production state analysis Product sample testing and (or) production state analysis For mass-produced products, if it is impossible or difficult to confirm conformity with the requirements on a full scale, when testing the end product.
An applicant-manufacturer, including the foreign one, in the presence of a person authorized by the manufacturer in the Customs Union’s territory.
Certificate of Conformity for mass-produced products
Certificate of Conformity for mass-produced products Management system certification Product sample testing and management system control
Examination (testing) of type Production state analysis Product sample testing and (or) production state analysis For complex products intended for a batch and mass production, as well as when planning a large number of product modifications.
An applicant-manufacturer, including the foreign one, in the presence of a person authorized by the manufacturer in the Customs Union’s territory.
Certificate of Conformity for mass-produced products
Examination (testing) of type Management system certification Product sample testing and management system inspection check-up
Based on the analysis of technical documentation - - For a limited batch of products supplied by foreign manufacturer, or complex products intended for the plant’s infrastructure in the Customs Union’s territory.
An applicant-manufacturer, including the foreign one, in the presence of a person authorized by the manufacturer in the Customs Union’s territory.
Certificate of conformity for a limited batch of products

Typical schemes for declaration of conformity

Number
of scheme
Scheme element Application Document of Conformity
Product testing Production evaluation Inspection check-up
1D Product sample testing is performed by manufacturer - Manufacturing supervision is performed by manufacturer For mass-produced products. An applicant -manufacturer of the CU member-state, or a person authorized by the foreign manufacturer in the CU territory. Declaration of Conformity for mass-produced products
2D Testing of batch of products (one-off item) is carried out by Applicant - - For batch of products (one-off item). An applicant-manufacturer, seller (supplier) of the CU member-state, or a person authorized by the foreign manufacturer in the CU territory. Declaration of Conformity for a batch of products (one-off item)
3D Product sample testing carried out by certified testing laboratory (centre) - Manufacturing supervision is performed by manufacturer For mass-produced products. An applicant-manufacturer of the CU member-state, or a person authorized by the foreign manufacturer in the CU territory. Declaration of Conformity for mass-produced products
4D Testing of batch of products (one-off item) by certified testing laboratory (centre) - - For batch of products (one-off item). An applicant-manufacturer, seller (supplier) of the CU member-state, or a person authorized by the foreign manufacturer in the CU territory. Declaration of Conformity for a batch of products (one-off item)
5D Examination (test) of type - Manufacturing supervision is performed by manufacturer For mass-produced products. An applicant-manufacturer of the CU member-state, or a person authorized by the foreign manufacturer in the CU territory. Declaration of Conformity for mass-produced products.
6D Product sample testing carried out by certified testing laboratory (centre) Management system certification and inspection check-up by management system certification body Manufacturing supervision is performed by manufacturer Declaration of Conformity for mass-produced products
Investigation of complaints


Complaints Procedure

  1. Accepting and consideration of complaints is a way of protecting interests of OSP NTP Truboprovod’s service consumers..
  2. Complaint is an expression of disagreement with a decision taken based on the results of the work on confirmation of conformity, associated with the body’s main activity, on the part of any organization or person.

    When considering a complaint between the OSP NTP Truboprovod and the applicant, objectivity, fairness, impartiality and confidentiality are ensured and respected.

    In the course of the complaint consideration, competent employees of the OSP NTP Truboprovod take part, which are directly relevant to the subject of the complaint, as well as interested representatives of the parties.

    The result of the complaint review by OSP NTP Truboprovod is a solution of the problem or a reasonable refusal.

  3. Upon receipt of a complaint, OSP NTP Truboprovod undertakes::
    • Registration of complaint;
    • Establishing contact persons and reliable communication links for interaction;
    • Analysis of the complaint’s content and identification of persons-in-charge;
    • Providing confidentiality in complaint handling;
    • Fair decision making;
    • Timely informing the applicant of the decision made;
    • Registration and storage of documents and working materials;
    • Complaint handling results analysis;
    • Development of corrective and preventive actions against repeated complaints.
  4. In case of disagreement on issues related to the main activity of OSP NTP Truboprovod, concerning confirmation of conformity, the applicant is entitled to address on vexed questions to the Head of OSP NTP Truboprovod.
  5. The complaint shall be prepared according to the rules of registration in the prescribed manner.

    The complaint shall specify the reasons for the dispute, justify the disagreement with the decision of the OSP NTP Truboprovod, include the appropriate documents, etc.

    The complaint shall be submitted by mail, fax, e-mail or in writing to OSP NTP Truboprovod no later than 30 calendar days upon the decision of OSP NTP Truboprovod, with which the applicant does not agree.

  6. The initial response shall be sent to the applicant in writing no later than 20 working days upon the date of the complaint registration, indicating:
    • Information on its receipt by OSP NTP Truboprovod;
    • Registration number;
    • Consideration time (not more than 2 months).
  7. The decision on the complaint is drawn up within 30 working days.. The decision on the complaint shall include:
    • In case of full or partial solution of complaint — due date and way of solution;
    • In case of full or partial dismissal of complaint: reasons for dismissal with reference to relevant laws and regulations, and evidences justifying dismissal;
    • List of documents substantiating validity of the decision.

    In case of disagreement with the decision, the applicant can contest it by appealing to the OSB NTP Truboprovod or higher authorities.

  8. The decision on the complaint shall be sent in writing to the applicant in writing, not later than 2 months from the date of its execution, using communication tools that provide a fixed sending, or against signed receipt.
  9. If there is no objection from the applicant to the decision on the complaint within 30 calendar days from the date of its sending, it shall be considered adopted.

Appeal proceedings


Appeal proceeding

  1. Receiving and consideration of appeals is a way of protecting the interests of consumers of services rendered by OSP NTP Truboprovod. The appeal proceeding is publicly available on the NTP Truboprovod’s website.
  2. Notice of appeal — appealing by the organization (interested person) of the decision on the complaint concerning the result of work on confirmation of conformity related to the main activities of the certification body, with a request to review the decision taken by this body regarding this object.

    An appellant is entitled to appeal to the OSP NTP Truboprovod with a request to review the decision on the complaint made by this body in relation to this object, based on the results of work on confirmation of conformity related to the body’s main activity.

    The Board of Appeals is functioning:

    • Upon receipt of appeals, as per the rules of registration, in accordance with established procedure;
    • During the time required for consideration and decision on appeal.

    The result of the Appeals Board’s work is solution of the problem encountered, or a reasonable refusal of such a decision.

  3. Board of Appeals consists of a chairman and two members. The chairman and members of the Appeals Board shall meet the criteria of competence and qualification requirements, have at least 3-year experience in the field of product certification, the activity of which does not extend to the content of the appellant’s claim.
  4. The Board of Appeals includes:

    • Chairman of the Appeals Board;
    • Members of the Appeals Board, including an independent expert from another organization;
    • Secretary.
  5. The main functions of the Commission are:
    • Resolving disputes related to the activity of the OSP NTP Truboprovod, in connection with the revision of the decision taken by this body in relation to this object;
    • Analysis and resolution of disagreements revealed during the consideration of complaints and appeals.
  6. In case of disagreement between the participants on issues related to the activity of OSP NTP Truboprovod, the appellant is entitled to appeal on vexed questions to the Chairman of the Appeals Board.
  7. The appeal shall be prepared according to the rules of registration in the prescribed manner.

    The appeal shall specify the reasons for the dispute, justify the disagreement with the decision of the OSP NTP Truboprovod, include the appropriate documents, etc.

    The appeal shall be submitted by mail, fax, e-mail or in writing to OSP NTP Truboprovod no later than 30 calendar days upon the decision of OSP NTP Truboprovod, with which the appellant does not agree.

  8. The Board shall consider the appeal and examine the situation. The initial answer shall be sent to the appellant in writing no later than 30 working days upon the date of the appeal registration, indicating:
    • Information on its receipt;
    • Registration number;
    • Consideration time (not more than 6 months).

    The Commission takes a decision by a simple majority of votes, by open voting, draws it up with a minutes of the meeting in any form. Based on the minutes of the meeting, a decision for appeal by the Appeals Board is prepared.

    The decision is drawn up within 15 working days and shall include:

    • In case of full or partial dismissal of appeal: reasons for dismissal with reference to relevant laws and regulations, and evidences justifying dismissal;
    • List of documents substantiating validity of the decision;
    • In case of full or partial dismissal of appeal — due date and way of allowance;
    • If the Board’s members have a special opinion, it shall be expressed in the decision.
  9. The decision on the appeal shall be sent in writing to the appellant by the person in charge of the quality management system (QMS) of the OSP NTP Truboprovod, no later than 30 working days from the date of its execution, using communication tools that provide a fixed sending, or against signed receipt. A copy of the Board’s protocol and decision remains in the OSP NTP Truboprovod.
Rights and obligations of applicants


The rights and obligations of the applicant in the field of mandatory confirmation of conformity in accordance with the Federal Law "On Technical Regulation" No. 184-FZ dated December 12, 2002.

Applicant is entitled to:

  • select the form and scheme of confirmation of conformity provided for certain types of products by applicable technical regulations;
  • apply for mandatory certification to any certification body, accreditation area of which covers the products that the applicant is going to certify;
  • apply to the accreditation body with complaints of illegal actions of certification bodies and accredited testing laboratories (centres), in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation;
  • Use technical documentation for confirmation of conformity of products to the requirements of technical regulations.

Applicant undertakes to:

  • provide conformity of products to the requirements of technical regulations;
  • release into circulation products subject to mandatory confirmation of conformity only after competing of such confirmation of conformity;
  • specify in the supporting documentation information about certificate or declaration of conformity;
  • submit to the State oversight (supervision) authorities responsible for compliance with the requirements of technical regulations, as well as to parties concerned, the documents proving the conformity of products with TR requirements (declaration of conformity, certificate of conformity or their copies), or registration number of certificate or declaration of conformity;
  • suspend or terminate sales of products, if the validity of the certificate or declaration of conformity is suspended or terminated;
  • notify the certification body of changes introduce in the technical documentation or manufacturing process of certified products;
  • suspend the manufacture of products that have passed the confirmation of conformity and do not satisfy the requirements of technical regulations, based on decisions of State oversight (supervision) authorities responsible for compliance with TR requirements;
  • suspend or terminate sales of products, if the validity of the certificate or declaration of conformity has expired, except for the products put into circulation in the Russian Federation during the validity period of the declaration or certificate of conformity, during the shelf life or service life of the products, established in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation.
Certification cost calculation procedure


When calculating the cost of mandatory certification of products and services, as well as registration of declaration of conformity accepted by manufacturer, OSP NTP Truboprovod follows the Certification Rules “Payment for Certification of Products and Services” approved by Resolution No. 44 dated August 23, 1999 of the RF Standardisation Metrology and Certification Committee (GosStandart).

General provisions.

Payment for certification of products and services is based on the following principles:

  • All actually performed certification work is paid for at the expense of the own funds of enterprises, organizations, persons who have applied for carrying out the relevant work, regardless of the decisions made based on such work results;
  • The profitability level of work on the mandatory certification should not exceed 35%;
  • Inspection check-up of mandatory certified products and services is paid in the amount of actual costs incurred by organizations performing the relevant work.

The daily rate of experts on certification of products and services involved in the implementation of mandatory certification, including work on inspection check-up of conformity of certified objects to the requirements of regulatory documents (RD), taken to calculate the cost of certification and inspection check-up, is determined by the certification body on its own, based on its terms of remuneration of employees.

Payment for registration of declarations of conformity.

Payment for registration of declaration of conformity is performed by manufacturer (seller, applicant) at twice the minimum monthly wage established by the Russian legislation.

As from July 1, 2016, the minimum wage rate used solely to regulate wages is established by the Federal Law No. 82-FZ dated June 19, 2000 (as amended by the Federal Law No. 164-FZ dated June 2, 2016) is 7,500 roubles.

Payment for mandatory certification of products and services.

Carrying out work on mandatory certification of products (services) assumes the following expenditures:

  • Certification body for products (services);
  • Testing laboratory;
  • Certification body for quality systems (production);
  • Services for inspection check-up for conformity of certified products (services) with RD, if inspection check-up is provided for by the certification scheme;
  • Services for certificate issuance.

In general, the total expenditures for certification of a specific product (service) (\( C \)) are determined from the formula:

$$ C = C_{ос} + C_{об} + C_{ип} + C_{а} + C_{ск} + \sum_{i=1}^n {C_{ик}}_{i} + \sum_{j=1}^{m} {C_{иск}}_{j} + C_{рс} + C_{д}, $$

где:

  • \( C_{ос} \) - cost of work performed by OSP NTP for certification of products (services), rubles (RUB);
  • \( C_{об} \) - cost of samples selected for certification tests (destructive), RUB;
  • \( C_{ип} \) - cost of product testing carried out by certified testing laboratory, RUB;
  • \( C_{а} \) - cost of production state analysis;
  • \( C_{ск} \) - cost of certification of production or quality system, RUB;
  • \( {C_{ик}}_{i} \) - cost of one inspection carried out within the scope of the inspection check-up for conformity of the mandatory certified products (services) with RD requirements, RUB;
  • \( n \) - the number of inspections provided for by the inspection check-up program for certified products within the period of validity of the certificate of conformity;
  • \( {C_{иск}}_{j} \) - cost of one inspection carried out within the scope of the inspection check-up for conformity of the certified quality (production) system with RD requirements, RUB;
  • \( m \) - the number of inspections of the certified quality (production) system for conformity with RD requirements, provided for by the inspection check-up program within the period of validity of the certificate of conformity;
  • \( C_{рс} \) - expenses for packaging, storage, disposal, loading and unloading operations, as well as transportation of samples to the test location, RUB;
  • \( C_{д} \) - cost of work on consideration of application-declaration.

The formula for calculating the certification work cost includes only elements that correspond to the composition of the actual workю

Expenditures of OSP NTP for certification of products (services \( C_{ос} \), quality and production systems \( C_{ск} \)) taking into account mandatory certification of specific products (services) are determined from the formula:

$$ C = {t_{ос}}_{i} \times T \times \left(1 + \frac{K_{нз} + K_{нр}}{100} \right) \times \left( 1 + \frac{P}{100} \right),$$

где:

  • \( {t_{ос}}_i \) - labor intensity of mandatory certification of specific products, according to the \( i \) scheme of certification, man-hours;
  • \( T \) - daily rate of expert, RUB;
  • \( K_{нз} \) - payroll standard established by applicable law, %;
  • \( K_{нр} \) - overhead ratio, %;
  • \( P \) - level of profitability, %.

Reference data for calculation.

Reference data for calculations are represented in tables of the appendixes of the Certification Rules “Payment for certification of products and services” approved by the RF State Standard No. 44 dated August 23, 1999 (as amended on July 5, 2002).

Test laboratories

Name of laboratory Accreditation certificate registration number Address Description of the scope of accreditation (indicating the abbreviation TR CU)
Testing laboratory of private educational institution "International Industrial Academy" (“PEI IIA”) РОСС RU.0001.21МР46 Legal address: ul. Shchipok 18, Moscow 115093, Russia

Actual address: 1st Schipkovsky per. 20, Moscow, 115093, Russia
TR CU 010/2011 "On Safety of Machinery and Equipment"

TR CU 032/2013 "On safety of equipment operating under excessive pressure"
Testing laboratory of Limited Liability Company "Testing Centre of Mechanical Products" РОСС RU.0001.21МИ24 Legal address: ul. Academika Kurchatova 3, Irkutsk 664074, Russia

Actual address: ul. Academika Kurchatova 3, Irkutsk 664074, Russia; Quarter 54, building 7, First industrial area, Angarsk, Irkutskаya oblast, 665805, Russia
TR CU 010/2011 "On Safety of Machinery and Equipment"
Testing laboratory of the Federal State Institution "State Regional Centre of Standardization, Metrology and Testing in Saint-Petersburg and Leningrad oblast" (FBU "Test-St.-Petersburg") RA.RU.21АГ86 Legal address: ul. Kurlyandskaya, St. Petersburg 1, 190103, Russia

Actual address: ul. Kurlyandskaya, St. Petersburg 1, 190103, Russia, ul. Drovyanaya 3a, lit. D, St. Petersburg
TR CU 004/2011 "On safety of low-voltage equipment"

TR CU 010/2011 "On Safety of Machinery and Equipment"

TR CU 016/2011"On safety of gas fuel apparatus"

TR CU 020/2011 "On electromagnetic compatibility of technical devices"
Limited Liability Company MeraTech (MeraTekh OOO) RA.RU.21АИ62 Legal address: ul. Kirova 113, ofc 468, Novosibirsk, Novosibirskfya oblast, 630008, Russia

Actual address: ul. Kirova 113, rooms 468, 236, 13, Novosibirsk, Novosibirskfya oblast, 630008, Russia
TR CU 010/2011 "On Safety of Machinery and Equipment"

TR CU 016/2011 "On safety of gas fuel apparatus"

TR CU "On safety of equipment operating under excessive pressure"
Regulatory documents used in work

  • RF Federal Law N 412-FZ dated December 28, 2013 “On Accreditation in the National Accreditation System”;
  • Order of the Ministry for Economic Development of the Russian Federation No. 326 dated May 30, 2014 “On approval of accreditation criteria, a list of documents confirming conformity of an applicant, an accredited person with accreditation criteria, and a list of standardization documents, conformity to which by applicants and accredited persons ensures their compliance with accreditation criteria”;
  • Federal Law of the Russian Federation “On Technical Regulation” No.184-FЗ dated December 15, 2002;
  • Federal Law of the Russian Federation “On Industrial Safety of Hazardous Production Facilities” No. 116-FZ dated July 21, 1997;
  • Federal Law of the Russian Federation "On Protection of Consumer Rights" No. 2300-1 dated February 2, 1992;
  • Federal Law of the Russian Federation “On Ensuring the Uniformity of Measurements” No. 102-FЗ dated June 26, 2008;
  • Edict of the President of the Russian Federation “On the Unified National Accreditation System” No. 86 dated January 24, 2011;
  • Decision of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission N 293 dated December 25, 2012 “On Uniform Forms of Certificate of Conformity and Declaration of Conformity with the Technical Regulations of the Customs Union and the Rules for Their Registration”;
  • Decision No.154 dated November 15, 2016 was taken by the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission (BEEC) “On introducing changes in the BEEC Decision No. 293 dated December 25, 2012”;
  • Regulatory documents indicated in the declared field and (or) in the register of accredited persons;
  • Decision of the Customs Union Commission (CUC) dated June 18, 2010 No. 319 "On Technical Regulation in the Customs Union";
  • CUC Decision dated July 15, 2011 No. 711 “On a single product commercialization mark on the market of the member states of the Customs Union”;
  • Consolidated list of products, in regard to which mandatory requirements are established within the framework of the Customs Union, approved by CUC Decision No. 526 dated January 28, 2011;
  • Procedure for use of typical schemes of evaluation (confirmation) of conformity to the requirements of the Technical Regulations of Customs Union (TR CU), approved by CUC Decision No. 621 dated April 7, 2011;
  • Technical Regulations of Customs Union TR CU 010/2011 "On Safety of Machinery and Equipment", approved by CUC Decision No. 823 dated October 18, 2011;
  • Technical Regulations of Customs Union TR CU 020/2011 “Electromagnetic compatibility of technical devices”, approved by CUC Decision No. 879 dated December 9, 2011;
  • Technical Regulations of Customs Union TR CU 004/2011 "On Safety of Low-voltage Equipment", approved by CUC Decision No. 768 dated August 16, 2011;
  • Technical Regulations of Customs Union TR CU 010/2013 “On safety of equipment operating under excessive pressure”, approved by CUC Decision No. 41 dated July 2, 2013;
  • GOST R ISO/IEC 17065-2012 “Conformity evaluation. Requirements for bodies for certification of products, processes and services”;
  • GOST ISO 9000-2011 “Quality Management Systems. Fundamental provisions and vocabulary”;
  • GOST ISO/IEC 17000-2012 “Conformity evaluation. Vocabulary and general concepts”;
  • GOST R 54293-2010 “Production state analysis, when confirming conformity”;
  • GOST 31814-2012 “Conformity evaluation. General rules for sampling to carry out product testing for confirmation of conformity”;
  • GOST 31815-2012 “Conformity evaluation. Inspection check-up procedure for certification purposes”;
  • GOST 31892-2012 “System of evaluation (confirmation) of conformity of the Customs Union. Fundamental provisions”;
  • GOST 31894-2012 “Terms and definitions, as pertaining to objects of evaluation (confirmation) of conformity in the Customs Union”;
  • GOST R 51293-99 “Product identification.Fundamental provisions”;
  • GOST R 56010-2014 “Conformity evaluation. Procedure for mandatory confirmation of conformity of products to the TR CU requirements”;
  • GOST R 56013-2014 “Conformity evaluation. Procedure for mandatory confirmation of conformity of products to the TR CU requirements “On Safety of Machinery and Equipment”;
  • GOST R 56017-2014 “Conformity evaluation. Procedure for mandatory confirmation of conformity of products to the TR CU requirements “On Safety of Machinery and Equipment ”On Safety of Low-voltage Equipment”;
  • GOST ISO/IEC 17067-2015 “Conformity evaluation. Main provisions of product certification and guidelines for product certification schemes”;
  • GOST 32809-2014 “Conformity evaluation. Product type assessment to evaluate (confirm) conformity of products with TR CU requirements”;
  • GOST R 56029-2014 “Conformity evaluation. Procedure for mandatory confirmation of conformity of products to the TR CU requirements ”Electromagnetic compatibility of technical devices”;
  • GOST R 56541-2015 “Conformity evaluation. General rules for product identification to evaluate (confirm) conformity with TR CU requirements”;
  • PR 50.3.002-95 “Typical procedure for handling samples used in the mandatory certification of products”;
  • GOST R 50460-92 “Mark of conformity for mandatory certification. Form, dimensions and technical requirements”;
  • Order of the RF Ministry of Economic Development No. 76 dated February 21, 2012 “On approval of the Procedure for registering declarations of conformity and the Procedure for the formation and maintenance of a unified register of registered declarations of conformity, providing information contained in the mentioned register";
  • Regulation on the registration of declarations of conformity of products to the TR CU requirements, approved by the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission (BEEC) N 76 dated September 4, 2013;
  • Order of the RF Ministry of Economic Development No. 752 dated November 24, 2014 “On approval of the procedure for registration of declarations of conformity and the procedure for the formation and maintenance of a register of declarations of conformity of products, included in a consolidated list of products subject to declaration of conformity”;
  • GOST R 53603-2009 RF National Standard “Conformity evaluation. Product Certification Schemes in the Russian Federation”;
  • RF GosStandart (State Standard) Resolution No. 17 dated August 5, 1997 “On the adoption and implementation of the Certification Rules”;
  • RF GosStandart (State Standard) Resolution No. 12 dated March 17, 1998 “On approval of certification rules “GOST R Certification System. Forms of the main documents used in the System”;
  • Resolution No. 76 dated November 4, 2000 “On the implementation of the RF GosStandart Voluntary Certification System”;
  • Clarifications concerning carrying out of voluntary certification in the GOST R certification system, in connection with the issuance of the Order of the RF Ministry of Industry and Trade No. 3358 dated September 22, 2016 “On recognition of decisions of the RF GosStandart (State Standard) No. 11 dated March 17, 1998, No. 30 dated April 22, 2002, and the Order of Rostekhregulirovaniye (Federal Agency on Technical Regulation and Metrology) No.1721 dated May 12, 2009 as not applicable.